Chicago Public Schools Strike

Years ago I read a story in the Chicago Tribune about a Chicago Public School teacher who reprimanded a student for not having his homework or not paying attention in class. She hadn’t been sarcastic or unprofessional in her choice of words, yet the boy felt embarrassed in front of his peers. I think we can all remember times when we did or didn’t do something in school and we got called on it. We were in the wrong, but it still felt bad.

This boy sought revenge. He wasn’t going to let this incident go so he took a hammer to school and when he had an opportunity, he hit his teacher again and again. This Chicago Public School teacher suffered permanent brain damage. Her family lost the woman they knew and had to adjust their lives as a family who’s father is a cop and he’s been shot or beaten. At least though, the police officer would have been trained and armed to defend himself.

Do you see why I side with the Chicago Public School teachers as they strike for a professional wage and object to accountability standards that are unrealistic given the challenges they face? Before the Chicago Public Schools test out merit pay and such new measures, Skokie, Glenview, Evanston and Waukegan and other communities with fewer challenges should see how it works first.

It does look like the parties will soon make a deal. I don’t think missing a week of school isn’t educational. I think, if they examine the situation, older students will certainly learn something quite important.

About these ads

True

When will we ever learn?

Shrewd and Legal, But

Several folks in this neighborhood spend a few months in Florida. Several own condos there. Most of these people live here most months and it seems like it’s more than six.

These people are Republicans and they realize Obama is likely to win Illinois. So one spouse, if not both, have registered to vote in Florida.

Florida could be a close race. What they’re doing is legal, but I don’t like gaming the system and I hate how these folks can be sanctimonious about their view of the Right Way to Be American. I doubt Democrats are doing the same, but wonder.

It really isn’t right when it comes to more local races. If I were a Floridian who lived in the state 12 months a year, I wouldn’t want carpet baggers electing judges and state representatives and such. Will these folks just vote for the national offices? If so they’re hurting the local races in Illinois.

Corporate Responsibility

Bank Vs America:  Activists protest BofA in Ch...

Ah, returning to the U.S. requires more than just getting over jet lag. I’ve also got to come to terms with the proximity with the political madness that is the 2012 election. I follow news when in China, but the distance is a buffer. I’m glad to be able to listen to Thom Hartman, the NewsHour, Chicago Tonight and MSNBC regularly, but it also is hard to be so close to the illogical rhetoric, so much of which is just fallacious.

I really wish news outlets wouldn’t televise stump speeches since too many candidates just make bogus assertions. Yes, a commentator can later point out the errors, but that’s like trying to unring a bell. Will everyone who needs to listen?

One of my major concerns is the ill effect of Citizens United, which allows the rich to influence not just the presidential election, but also local elections for judges, aldermen (sic), state representatives, etc. A corporation can call the shots about who gets elected locally so that they get someone who’ll support laws and judgments that favor corporate interests. I could scream.

This email from Ralph Nadar says what needs to be said:
By Ralph Nader

What would happen if we asked the executives of the giant U.S. corporations, whose products constantly surround us, to show some corporate patriotism?

After all, General Electric, DuPont, Citigroup, Pfizer and others demand that they be treated as “persons” under our Constitution and our laws. And, they expect unfiltered loyalty from American workers even to the point of blocking the organization of unions so workers can band together for collective bargaining.

Moreover, many of these corporations expect to be bailed out by American taxpayers when they are in trouble, and they regularly receive a covey of direct and indirect government subsidies, giveaways and complex handouts.

Some of them pay no federal income taxes year after year, and a few game the tax laws to receive additional money back from the U.S. Treasury. Historically, the U.S. Marines and other U.S. armed forces have risked their lives to protect or protect these corporations’ overseas interests by invading or menacing numerous countries.

So it is reasonable for the American people to expect some reciprocity from these immense corporate entities that were born in the U.S. and rose to their economic prowess on the backs of American workers. The bosses of these companies believe they can have it both ways – getting all the benefits of their native country while shipping whole industries and jobs to communist and fascist regimes abroad that keep their workers in serf-like conditions.

The first test as to whether these U.S. companies have any allegiance to the U.S. and its communities is to demand that CEOs stand up at their annual shareholders meetings and pledge allegiance in the name of their corporation, not their boards of directors, “to the flag of the United States of America,” ending with that ringing phrase, voiced by millions of Americans daily, “with liberty and justice for all.”

More than seventy years ago, a famous Marine general, the double Congressional Medal of Honor awardee Smedly Butler, said his Marines were ordered to make sure the flag followed U.S. companies from Central America to Asia. In the past, the lack of allegiance was shockingly callous. DuPont and General Motors worked openly with fascist Germany and its companies before World War II and did not sever all dealings when hostilities started.

About fifteen years ago, I sent letters to the CEOs of the top 100 largest U.S. chartered corporations asking that they pledge allegiance to our country in the name of their company at their annual shareholders meetings. Their responses were instructive. Many said they would review the request; others turned it down, while some were ambiguous, misconstruing the request as being directed to their boards of directors instead of their U.S. chartered corporate entity.

Walmart replied that they would “give it every consideration.” Federated Department Stores expressly thought it was a good suggestion. Citicorp (now Citigroup) wrote that it is “not our practice to respond.”

Time for an update. I’ve just sent letters to twenty of the largest U.S. chartered companies renewing the request for the pledge. They include Exxon Mobil, Walmart, Chevron, General Motors, General Electric, Ford Motor, AT&T, Bank of America, Verizon Communications, J.P. Morgan Chase, Apple, CVS Caremark, IBM, Citigroup and Cardinal Health.

Imagine the CEOs of General Motors (or Exxon Mobil, Citigroup, Bank of America, etc.) pledging allegiance “to the Flag of the United States of America and the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”

You may wish to contact these companies and urge their CEOs to take the pledge. This effort needs your participation as consumers, workers, taxpayers or shareholders. It opens up a long-overdue discussion about corporate patriotism and what it all should mean.

As conservative author Patrick Buchanan wrote some years ago: “If they [large U.S. corporations] are not loyal to us, why should we be loyal to them?”

ALEC? What’s That?

I hadn’t heard about ALEC. I did know about the School of the Americas and do write legislators to close it. Both matters remind me it’s time to write again.

I don’t think America needs either.

The Bo Xilai Story

US Secretary Gutierrez meets with Chinese Mini...

US Secretary Gutierrez meets with Chinese Minister Bo Xilai cropped from File:US_Secretary_Gutierrez_meets_with_Chinese_Minister_Bo_Xilai.jpg (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I’ve been following the Bo Xilai story as best I can, which is hard to do in China. At first the details were murky and I couldn’t figure out exactly what is alleged to have happen, but finally The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, The New Yorker, The Guardian and others have clearer reports of what’s believed to have gone on.

What’s interesting is how little coverage the story gets here.  A month ago CCTV reported that tangentially that several websites had been closed down for “spreading rumors” and that the

I’d just pieced together parts of the story, but now it’s clear that Bo’s wife, Gu Kailai, is implicated in the murder of a British man, Neil Heywood, who was to help her send lots of money overseas. That Bo has tapped the phones used by high ranking CP officials and that although his job was to stop corruption, he was highly corrupt and also imprisoned people who crossed him. An NPR report a month ago mentioned that family members of missing people in his district were afraid to speak out about their missing relatives.

If this happened in the US, people would be talking about it. A lot.

That’s a big difference in living in China. I wouldn’t ask anyone about it as I think I’d be rude or worse. If a student brought this up, I’d be surprised and I’d probably change the subject, though I’ve been quite open about the scallywags in Illinois politics.  I also don’t perceive the kind of energy that surfaces in the midst of a scandal. There’s no uptick in gossip that I can detect. Yet as I don’t speak Chinese I wouldn’t know, though I would pick up on the change of energy.

Well, it seems that the CCTV segment that showed that all is well in Mr. Bo’s Chongqing was might be on the money. There was an insipid segment on the news in which a reporter went to a GAP-like store in Chongqing and interviewed the assistant manager and a shopper or two. All said everything was hunky dory. Well, sure. When Blogojevich was on trial it’s not like, people stopped needing new jeans. Yet as I watched the report of how calm it was, made me suspicious. Why would someone report about a calm day?

Snippets from Saturday’s Lunch

On Saturday I had lunch with a friend of a friend and his wife. Mr. Li is a professor at Shandong University and quite a good, i.e. provocative conversationalist.

Here’s some of what he shared during lunch. I really should have taken notes and asked probing follow up questions, but lunch isn’t the same as Meet the Press.

Mr. Li thinks Bill Clinton is the best president in the last 25 years. He believes [get this] Obama is too much of a communist. As our conversation went on he said that

He thinks increased access to education is a cheaper way to control the population growth, rather than the one child policy.

He talked about violence in China as an aesthetic and something the government supports. I wasn’t really clear on this, but his idea and theirs (?) is that it’s a beautiful outlet. His wife wasn’t so sure.

They told me that Chinese people hate doctors and nurses, because they pretty much manhandle patients. His brother-in-law is a doctor and got a fish bone stuck in his throat. The nurse who treated him just pulled his tongue so hard that it not only dislodge the bone, but now doesn’t fit in his mouth. (Huh? A lot of the conversation was pretty surreal.) Angela confirmed what I’d read that women giving birth are just berated and treated with no respect or compassion.

Their consensus was that China’s a great place to live if you’re rich and powerful. (Where isn’t?) And Scandinavia‘s a great place to live if you’re needy.

They loved American libraries. I agree with that.

Chinese students, they told me, are freedom adverse. They simply want to be told what to do and how to do it. That explains a lot since many students aren’t keen on creative thinking or free discussion. Many seem English adverse, not all but many of mine. Which always leads me to the question why couldn’t your parents find you a major you’re interested in?

I was surprised by how candid the Li’s were. Was it a test?

There’s always these paranoid fears in the Middle Kingdom and there’s a line you don’t cross, or several such lines so it does seem impossible to ever know a Chinese person as closely as other nationalities.

Weekly Photo Challenge: Arranged

Shoes for Sale

at a temple market in Beijing

The arrangement of a Beijing park

New to The Daily Post? Whether you’re a beginner or a professional, you’re invited to get involved in our Weekly Photo Challenge to help you meet your blogging goals and give you another way to take part in Post a Day / Post a Week. Everyone is welcome to participate, even if your blog isn’t about photography.

Here’s how it works:

1. Each week, we’ll provide a theme for creative inspiration. You take photographs based on your interpretation of the theme, and post them on your blog anytime before the following Friday when the next photo theme will be announced.

2. To make it easy for others to check out your photos, title your blog post “Weekly Photo Challenge: (theme of the week)” and be sure to use a “postaday2012″ or “postaweek2012″ tag.

3. Subscribe to The Daily Post so that you don’t miss out on weekly challenge announcements. Sign up via the email subscription link in the sidebar or RSS.

More than meets the eye in Beijing | The Japan Times Online

Here’s a view of the China National People’s Congress from one of the neighbors here in Northern Asia:

More than meets the eye in Beijing | The Japan Times Online.

An Interesting Thought

I was apologizing to a Japanese friend who lives in Chicago about the mudslinging and lack of dignified, worthy participants in the Republican primaries. It’s been so embarrassing, I think, that a major party with millions of members can’t find a better slate of options. I’m embarrassed for the Republicans.

My friend laughed and said at least in America you’ve got all this transparency. I think that in Japan they’re just as bad, but the reporting never reveals this prior to the election.

Japan’s far from a perfect government if you consider that since 2000 they have had 7 prime ministers.

Previous Older Entries Next Newer Entries

Disclaimer

Dear Fellows, The State Department has requested that any Fellows who maintain their own blog or website please post the following disclaimer on your site: "This website is not an official U.S. Department of State website. The views and information presented are the English Language Fellows' own and do not represent the English Language Fellow Program or the U.S. Department of State." We appreciate your cooperation. Site Meter
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 338 other followers

%d bloggers like this: